Member-only story

Presidential Decision Making and Blame Avoidance in Vietnam and Iraq: A Comparative Examination of Political Leadership

Scott Parker

·6.9k Followers· Follow

Published in Pandora S Trap: Presidential Decision Making And Blame Avoidance In Vietnam And Iraq

6 min read · 1 week before

255 View Claps

45 Respond

Save

Listen

Pandora's Trap: Presidential Decision Making and Blame Avoidance in Vietnam and Iraq

by Thomas Preston

4 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	2334 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Screen Reader	:	Supported
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Print length	:	284 pages

The decisions made by presidents in times of war have a profound impact on the lives of millions of people. The United States' involvement in the Vietnam and Iraq wars provides two striking examples of the challenges and consequences of presidential decision-making in the context of war. In both cases, the decisions made by presidents were highly controversial and led to significant loss of life and suffering.

This article examines the decision-making processes of presidents Lyndon B. Johnson and George W. Bush in the Vietnam and Iraq wars, respectively. It explores the factors that influenced their decisions, the ways in which they sought to avoid blame for the consequences of their actions, and the implications of their decisions for the future of American foreign policy.

Decision-Making in the Vietnam War

President Johnson's decision to escalate the U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War was a complex one, influenced by a variety of factors. These factors included the Cold War rivalry with the Soviet Union, the domino theory, and the belief that the United States had a moral obligation to support South Vietnam.

Johnson was also influenced by his own personal ambition and his desire to avoid being seen as weak on communism. He believed that if he did not escalate the war, he would be seen as a failure and the United States would lose its credibility as a world leader.

In Free Download to avoid blame for the consequences of his decision, Johnson employed a variety of strategies. He blamed the North Vietnamese for the escalation of the war and he claimed that the United States was fighting for a just cause. He also used the media to create a favorable image of the war and he censored information that might have damaged public support for the war.

However, Johnson's efforts to avoid blame were ultimately unsuccessful. The war became increasingly unpopular as the body count mounted and the United States suffered a series of military setbacks. Johnson eventually lost the support of the American people and he was forced to resign from office in 1968.

Decision-Making in the Iraq War

President Bush's decision to invade Iraq in 2003 was also a complex one, influenced by a variety of factors. These factors included the 9/11 terrorist attacks, the belief that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction, and the desire to remove Saddam Hussein from power.

Bush was also influenced by his own personal ambition and his desire to be seen as a strong leader. He believed that invading Iraq would make the United States safer from terrorism and that it would also spread democracy in the Middle East.

In Free Download to avoid blame for the consequences of his decision, Bush employed a variety of strategies. He blamed Saddam Hussein for the 9/11 attacks and he claimed that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction. He also used the media to create a favorable image of the war and he censored information that might have damaged public support for the war.

However, Bush's efforts to avoid blame were ultimately unsuccessful. The war became increasingly unpopular as the body count mounted and the United States suffered a series of military setbacks. Bush eventually lost the support of the American people and he was defeated in the 2008 presidential election.

The decisions made by presidents Lyndon B. Johnson and George W. Bush in the Vietnam and Iraq wars, respectively, provide valuable insights into the complexities of presidential decision-making and blame avoidance. Both presidents were influenced by a variety of factors, including the Cold War rivalry, the domino theory, and their own personal ambitions.

Both presidents also employed a variety of strategies to avoid blame for the consequences of their decisions. These strategies included blaming others, claiming that the war was necessary, and using the media to create a favorable image of the war.

However, the efforts of both presidents to avoid blame were ultimately unsuccessful. The wars became increasingly unpopular as the body count mounted and the United States suffered a series of military setbacks. Both presidents eventually lost the support of the American people and they were both defeated in their respective presidential elections.

The lessons learned from the Vietnam and Iraq wars are important for future presidents to consider. These lessons include the importance of making decisions based on sound intelligence, the need to be honest with the American people about the risks and costs of war, and the importance of avoiding blame avoidance strategies.

By learning from the mistakes of the past, future presidents can make better decisions about war and peace.

Pandora's Trap: Presidential Decision Making and Blame Avoidance in Vietnam and Iraq

by Thomas Preston

4 out of 5